caprices: (Default)
Yay! I have talked with a dietitian! I now know why the low residue diet is silly but necessary, and I furthermore have gained support for following an almost-but-maybe-not-strictly-"pure" macrobiotic diet. Not until after the low-res thing is taken care of, but the dietitian was helpful and actually gave me a timeline, unlike my eminently unhelpful GI who basically said "Follow these vague and unhelpful guidelines until we can set up an appointment for you to have a procedure that may or may not mean you have to have surgery."

No, now I have a very specific set of instructions: Stay low-res until the procedure, and if anything will make the surgery unnecessary, that will do it. If surgery is still necessary, then I can look forward to more low-res, but they will probably let me eat food with texture again after about a week, maybe sooner. And then I will be free to follow bizarre food regimes to my heart's content.

But until then, I really do have to stick with low-res. I had not understood the reasoning before, but basically the idea is that even if nothing appears to be wrong, any food with residue (i.e. vegetables, oatmeal, etc.) will leave the residue on the near side of my stricture. I wouldn't feel anything for a while, because liquids would be passing without a problem, but ultimately it could result in another partial obstruction or worse. The things I may or may not have eaten with residue this last week *innocent whistle* potentially have all piled up, but they may sort themselves out and go liquidy enough to pass through. And if the stricture is only inflammation, then giving it a week of plain, plain food ought to clear it up enough that they'll be able to tell that it was not a permanent, surgery-requiring stricture after all.

Apparently I am the sort of patient who really does need things spelled out, though. I found out that pretty much all the stuff that was not included on the list of allowed foods was not allowed for a reason, but even so, I needed the dietitian to explain to me why specifically. Peanut butter, for instance, has fiber, therefore has residue, therefore is not good for me right now. The thing my GI did not make clear to me, though, was that the low-res diet actually has the potential to fix the problem. The impression I'd gotten was that it was merely a palliative measure, kind of like telling someone with a headache to take an aspirin. They don't always take the aspirin, but it doesn't matter...
caprices: (Default)
I talked with my GI PA (physician's assistant: almost a doctor but not!) yesterday and became royally annoyed with her. After the hospital scare on Tuesday, I realized that I haven't really made an effort to follow up on the possible ways to keep myself healthy. For instance, I still eat cookies. Granted, cookies are very important to me on a reward basis and baking them is a nearly-ritualized destressing mechanism. But cookies and sugar in general are one of those things I overindulge in.

"So," said I to the PA, "I've been reevaluating and I think I would like to try changing my diet to see if that helps."
With horror in her voice, my PA said, "Don't stop taking your medications!"
"Um, I wasn't planning on stopping my medications..."
"And this is a serious problem (the stricture), which requires western medicine, you're just going to get yourself in trouble.""
"Um...I just thought maybe I should look at diet as something helpful...just, do you know a nutritionist I could talk to?"
"No. I don't know any nutritionists. I suppose I can look into it." And my PA ended the conversation rather quickly.

Upon reflection and a friend's helpful explanation of the difference between the terms "nutritionist" and "dietitian", I suppose I can understand why my PA thought I was going crazy...

"wanting to talk to a nutritionist, yep, she's going all holistic on me..."

Still...What the heck is a GI specialist doing not knowing any dietitians? Even if you don't want to endorse hippy-dippy alternative medicine, your patients could probably still use advice now and then on things like: what exactly am I supposed to be eating for the next month? Seeing as the clinic is taking its time on seeing me for the next urgent round of western medicine?

I pride myself on being in a medical field and understanding the science behind a lot of it. I am very aware of how hope and ignorance fuel a lot of false claims. I am also very aware of how there are gaping holes in our knowledge. The most common statement about IBD is "we don't really know anything about it." The second most common thing you hear is "there aren't any studies showing that diet affects it." Well, fiddle-dee-dee, there haven't been that many IBD diet studies done in the first place. It's one of those undertakings which terrifies researchers because of the sheer unwieldiness of the task. But as far as I can tell, the way the medical community has decided to handle it by dismissing out of hand anything that does not have a good scientific trial attached. As opposed to saying, "Ah-ha, here is an opportunity for a good scientific trial."

More to follow once I'm done with exams and can do some actual research and talking with people.

June 2014

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223242526 2728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2017 07:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios